Hello, I happened to get a NP3 Altria on FGO, but I plan on getting Chloe NP5 anyways.
Which would be better if I only had to take one? Archuria or Chloe? Chloe has a 1500%, a 150% NP+ dmg advantage over Archuria's 1350% NP dmg.
As well as, I'm still progressing through the story only the fourth singularity so a long way till Camelot. Will there be more events to get the Camelot medals? Having trouble getting 15 more medals.
I'm pretty sure in terms of NP-damage Altria is already better than Chloe at NP2. At NP3 I see no reason to use Chloe over Altria unless you prefer her. BTW the damage calculations were done factoring in Altria's superior attack stat and her territory creation passive, which Chloe does not have.
The next event (nerofest) will have a lottery system where you can get lots of medals.
zer0z said it. For damage Squirtle surpasses Kuro pretty easily at np2. For that matter the only possible reason you can compare Kuro to Squirtle at np1 is because Kuro can be np5ed and Squirtle is still marginally ahead there although it is only marginal and they are close enough
what they said plus Artoria can spam her NP easier and can deal more consistent damage coz of her 3 turn arts steroid compared to Kuro's 1 turn projection.
with all that said use Kuro coz she's a tanned lo- oh crap. tiem to make my escape
Stupid medals barely dropped at all during camelot. Thank goodness summer and prisma had some for my saberlot. So glad to hear nerofest has metals in the lottery, saberlot's skills need WAY more! Guess I have a grind fest coming up.
