Grailed Chloe
Which is better between a lvl 90 chloe who will be np5 and Orion NP1 ?
Cause i still have my orion on lvl 50, so im thinking to Grail Chole to lvl 90 if she can perform better than orion as a ST crit Archer ..
Answers
Against males, definitely Orion. For any other enemy type, the difference is probably negligible.
- Log in to post comments
To match Orion, you'd need to grail Chloe to lvl 100. And im about do do that.
- Log in to post comments
Although Orion might have higher NP damage against males, Kuro will probably outdamage her in the long run with NP spams. Plus, Kuro is more useful in normal situations. As a person with Orion, I would much rather use Kuro.
- Log in to post comments
Orion works differently. Her damage is tied to big bursts rather than continuous spam. I do agree though that Kuro's style of dps is more entertaining not to mention Orion has some of the most boring animations in the game.
- Log in to post comments
Except for the Male attacking, which Orion performed better, Kuro is almost same as Orion. Grailed Kuro is still not 100% matching Orion's HP/attack status, however, Orion's art card's NP generation is quite poor, this is not bad for "their" quick cards but quick card is not so compatible for a art team except a brave chain for them. So recently I even considered dual Waver are better than Waver + Tamamo for Orion's support as critical damaging.
So I prefer Orion as normal ”continuous“ damager and more durable (thanks to her 1st skill+one of the most excellent debuff effect from NP) for a long match; but for Kuro you have to play more wisely like when to apply her three skills, and when to burst her damage to your enemy in only several turns and spam NP.
Off course, Kuro is definitely worth for grailing to Lv90 even Lv100. Just like tier list, one best 4 stars.
- Log in to post comments
Oh, by the way although I didn't test it, is seems that Kuro's NP5 damage is normally higher than Orion NP1 even at Lv 80, except male attacking.
- Log in to post comments